Prev: Edward Witten wins Newton medal
Next: Student understanding of time in special relativity: simultaneity and reference frames (Seto in a nutshell)
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 2 Jul 2010 02:56

     MISSING MASS Solved


Now I used to rate the Missing Mass Problem much higher than
the blackbody cosmic background radiation. I did this because the
mass
of the Universe is more important of a physical overall feature
than the cosmic temperature. How much mass the Cosmos
has is more important to the future of the Cosmos than its
characteristic feature of temperature.


But now I rate this Missing Mass Problem lower because of the
precision and our precision measurement of the cosmic
temperature versus the imprecision we obtain with cosmic
mass measurements.


Cosmic Missing Mass Conundrum starts with astronomers
of the 20th century observing and recording the motion of
globular clusters and other astronomical objects in that they
possessed Solid Body Rotation. But this Solid Body Rotation
can have a Missing Mass Problem of anywhere from 70%
missing mass to that of 99% missing mass.


We all know that in an atom and thus an Atom Totality that
over 99% of the mass resides in the nucleus of the atom.


In the first 7 years of the 21st century, astronomers are
caught busy by looking for goofy and silly things such as "brown
dwarf stars" and then "dark matter" and then "dark
energy" to explain why so much of the mass of the Cosmos
is missing. The Atom Totality simply says over 99
percent of the Cosmic mass resides in the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality. And the Nucleus is the Great Attractor
near the Great Wall of galaxies directional to the Sloan
Great Wall of galaxies.


I suppose when astronomers of the 21st century confirm
that the rotational speed of Solid Body Rotation of
the Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall is so much slower
of a speed than say the Milky Way and neighboring galaxies
would be conclusive evidence that the Sloan Great Wall
is very close and nearby to the Nucleus of the 231Pu
Atom Totality. (The familar analogy is that a vinyl record
player of a point near the center travels a slower speed around
than does a point on the edge of the record since it travels
so much more distance to make one revolution.)


So we live in exciting times where the astronomers could
easily report the above.

Let me add to the above, here in July 2010. I choose to put the
Blackbody CMBR ahead of Missing Mass because the CMBR is
so very precise of a measuring and it is blackbody. From that singular
evidence of blackbody CMBR we can dismiss the Big Bang theory
as a fakery theory. If the CMBR had not been blackbody, then the Big
Bang would still be alive as a theory.

The trouble with the Missing Mass evidence is that a biased researcher
who favors the Big Bang can report a missing mass of 70% missing based
on some solid-body-rotation analysis. So we can see reports vary from
one groups claiming 70% missing mass and some group reporting 99%
missing mass. Until the day we get precision measuring of the amount
of
Missing Mass of the Cosmos, is the day that we combine the blackbody
CMBR with the Missing Mass data. And surely with the two of those
data in, we trashcan either the Big Bang or the Atom Totality. But
since the
Atom Totality is the only theory that has a blackbody CMBR, logic
expects
that the true data of Missing Mass is 99% of the Cosmic mass is
missing because
it is in the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.

Now maybe someday, we can make precision measurements of the arc of
rotation of galaxies further from the Nucleus. So that the Milky Way
galaxy
arc of rotation is a faster speed than a galaxy close to the Nucleus.
And this
is probably why the Great Wall and Sloan Great Walls are so dense with
galaxies is because they are so close and near the Nucleus of the Atom
Totality.

I am confident that within this 21st century we pinpoint the Nucleus
of the Plutonium
Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Edward Witten wins Newton medal
Next: Student understanding of time in special relativity: simultaneity and reference frames (Seto in a nutshell)