Prev: [PATCH 13/49] memblock: Remove memblock_type.size and add memblock.memory_size instead
Next: [PATCH 36/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_to_bootmem()
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab on 25 Jul 2010 14:10 Em 20-07-2010 18:41, Jarod Wilson escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:11:40PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:50:27 PDT, Dmitry Torokhov said: >> >>>> And things go downhill from there... >>> >>> I guess you need these 2 from Jarod... >> >> Hmm. I seem to remember 2 similar patches from the last time I reported it. :) >> >> System boots fine after applying those two patches. I'll let somebody else >> worry about making sure they end up in linux-next in time for the next merge >> window... > > I believe Mauro's on vacation at the moment, but due back Real Soon Now, > and I'd expect him to pick up both fixes shortly after he settles back in > at his desk, so they should be in next before much longer, and definitely > before the merge window. I just arrived from vacations. I'll be testing this patch and applying it if OK. Just give me some days, since I have a huge backlog due to vacations. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |