From: Nitin Gupta on

On 01/05/2010 04:28 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>
>> This callback is required when RAM based devices are
>> used as swap disks. One such device is ramzswap[1] which
>> is used as compressed in-memory swap disk. For such
>> devices, we need a callback as soon as a swap slot is no
>> longer used to allow freeing memory allocated for this
>> slot. Without this callback, stale data can quickly
>> accumulate in memory defeating the whole purpose of
>> such devices.
>>
>> Another user of this callback will be "preswap" as
>> introduced by "Transcendent Memory" patches:
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/367286/
>> (I intend to integrade preswap with ramzswap).
>>
>> [1] ramzswap: http://code.google.com/p/compcache/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta(a)vflare.org>
>
> Yes, thanks for your patience in putting this together:
> I much prefer this version to all the other ways considered.
>

> (Though you should later add a comment, pointing out that this
> callback is with swap_lock and often page table lock also held.)
>

I will send another patch for this.

> We know that's unsatisfactory, but it is the nature of swap:
> cutting some corners to get the job done without allocating
> more memory. Having tried myself to do proper discard at
> swap_free time, I know that is hard: and I believe you've
> made the right decision to do it in this way for ramzswap.
>
> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins(a)tiscali.co.uk>
>

Thanks for the review.
So, is this now going in mmotm tree?

Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/