From: Steve Howard on 21 Jun 2010 07:53 On Jun 20, 12:51 pm, tb <t.be...(a)web.de> wrote: > When i'm using expdp there, is no progress after one hour. Hi, What is it waiting on? Regards, Steve
From: joel garry on 21 Jun 2010 13:09 On Jun 21, 12:24 am, Noons <wizofo...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > tb wrote,on my timestamp of 21/06/2010 2:51 AM: > > > i have to move a 10.2.0.3 database from solaris sparc to red hat > > linux. I see 4 possibilities > > > 1. exp/imp > > 2. expdp/impdp > > 3. Transportable Tablespaces > > 4. Oracle Streams > > > The first approach was expdp and was not succesful, because there are > > 400000 database objects in a 100GByte database. When i'm using expdp > > there, is no progress after one hour. I think exp will take between 30 > > and 35 hours. Any idea is welcome. > > That must be indeed a very slooooow Solaris sparc system! > I regularly export 100GB with expdp in AIX in much less than 2 hours. > Admittedly: a lot less than 400k db objects. Around 75K. See http://www.orafaq.com/usenet/comp.databases.oracle.server/2006/11/15/0883.htm expdp springs memory leaks (see bug 5095025 for too little information), and Solaris just generally seems to have idiosyncratic performance issues, which I say based on the posts I've seen in various places, my personal knowledge of it is way old, but it was true then, too. See http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/pga-leaks/ and Tanel's stuff referenced there and the interesting comments for some things to look at. For me, 50G (export size) direct path exp takes 45 minutes, full rman about an hour on hp-ux, low end san. Some people have complained about LOB and domain indexes expdp performance. jg -- @home.com is bogus. "Any sufficiently optimistic statement is indistinguishable from sarcasm." - Eric Smith
From: Noons on 22 Jun 2010 09:30 joel garry wrote,on my timestamp of 22/06/2010 3:09 AM: >> That must be indeed a very slooooow Solaris sparc system! >> I regularly export 100GB with expdp in AIX in much less than 2 hours. >> Admittedly: a lot less than 400k db objects. Around 75K. > > See http://www.orafaq.com/usenet/comp.databases.oracle.server/2006/11/15/0883.htm > > expdp springs memory leaks (see bug 5095025 for too little > information), and Solaris just generally seems to have idiosyncratic > performance issues, which I say based on the posts I've seen in > various places, my personal knowledge of it is way old, but it was > true then, too. Yikes! And this is now Oracle's own OS... I'm truly glad we decided to ditch all Solaris stuff a few years ago and gone all AIX/Looneeks! Long before it all became Oracle. > For me, 50G (export size) direct path exp takes 45 minutes, full rman > about an hour on hp-ux, low end san. Ball park what I get as well with AIX, 10.2.0.3 patched to the ears. > Some people have complained about LOB and domain indexes expdp > performance. Haven't had a problem. In fact if anything, I'm impressed with datapump's performance and capability in AIX! Use it all the time now, instead of good ole exp/imp. The only problem so far was a glitch that stopped sub-partitioned tables from being imported in both data mode and transportable ts mode. Quickly fixed by application of a patch that changed the XML skeleton used by the datapump mechanism.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Oracle 10g : is possible return a sys ref cursor for sql from clob variable Next: RMAN |