ms.net framework??
in [Computer]
|
Prev: help
Next: Download managers
From: len garden on 8 Oct 2007 13:44 thanks mr arnold, been trying not to contact them as they are of asian origin and very ahrd to understand, but i will e/mail them today, just hoped that i might get the info to remove the offending software from the group. snipped With peace and brightest of blessings, len & bev -- "Be Content With What You Have And May You Find Serenity and Tranquillity In A World That You May Not Understand." http://www.lensgarden.com.au/
From: "Mr. Arnold" MR. on 8 Oct 2007 22:03 "Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmainiac.nospam.net> wrote in message news:fedhkn$b3n$1(a)registered.motzarella.org... > Mr. Arnold wrote: > > Snipped. > >> Are you serious? .Net is dead in your face. It's not going anywhere. >> More and more companies along with software developers in the business >> sectors are using .Net for Windows desktop and Web solutions, because >> .Net is a standard, and the .NET Framework has to be on the machine. >> And more and more .Net solutions are coming to the home sector, and >> there is no doubt that. .Net is even being used on Linux, and .Net is >> down to running on watches and cellular phone. > > I'm curious! What in Linux uses .net ? > Because .Net is a stanadrd used by many lanuages and platforms is the reason it can run on Linux. http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page http://www.arunmicrosystems.netfirms.com/others.html Where the programmers go, so does the industry. And until programmers like me start programming on Linux using something like the likes of .Net that makes it easy to program on different platforms, then Linux is really not going anywhere. But on the other hand, MS may just choke off Linux to keep Linux being used by the few. http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/
From: "Mr. Arnold" MR. on 8 Oct 2007 22:03 "Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmainiac.nospam.net> wrote in message news:fedhkn$b3n$1(a)registered.motzarella.org... > Mr. Arnold wrote: > > Snipped. > >> Are you serious? .Net is dead in your face. It's not going anywhere. >> More and more companies along with software developers in the business >> sectors are using .Net for Windows desktop and Web solutions, because >> .Net is a standard, and the .NET Framework has to be on the machine. >> And more and more .Net solutions are coming to the home sector, and >> there is no doubt that. .Net is even being used on Linux, and .Net is >> down to running on watches and cellular phone. > > I'm curious! What in Linux uses .net ? > Because .Net is a standard used by many languages and platforms is the reason it can run on Linux. http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page http://www.arunmicrosystems.netfirms.com/others.html Where the programmers go, so does the industry. And until programmers like me start programming on Linux using something like the likes of .Net that makes it easy to program on different platforms, then Linux is really not going anywhere. But on the other hand, MS may just choke off Linux to keep Linux being used by the few. http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/
From: Baron on 9 Oct 2007 14:31 Mr. Arnold wrote: > > "Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmainiac.nospam.net> wrote in message > news:fedhkn$b3n$1(a)registered.motzarella.org... >> Mr. Arnold wrote: >> >> Snipped. >> >>> Are you serious? .Net is dead in your face. It's not going anywhere. >>> More and more companies along with software developers in the >>> business sectors are using .Net for Windows desktop and Web >>> solutions, because .Net is a standard, and the .NET Framework has to >>> be on the machine. And more and more .Net solutions are coming to >>> the home sector, and there is no doubt that. .Net is even being used >>> on Linux, and .Net is down to running on watches and cellular phone. >> >> I'm curious! What in Linux uses .net ? >> > > Because .Net is a standard used by many languages and platforms is the > reason > it can run on Linux. My understanding is that it does not run on Linux! > http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page > http://www.arunmicrosystems.netfirms.com/others.html I'm well aware of "Mono" but it isn't ".net" is it ? > Where the programmers go, so does the industry. And until programmers > like me start programming on Linux using something like the likes of > .Net that makes it easy to program on different platforms, then Linux > is really not going anywhere. > > But on the other hand, MS may just choke off Linux to keep Linux being > used by the few. > http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/ Thing is ".net" is proprietary! M$ may or may not try to use it to attack Linux. "Mono" is open source and cannot be controlled at the whim of M$. -- Best Regards: Baron.
From: "Mr. Arnold" MR. on 9 Oct 2007 21:57
"Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmainiac.nospam.net> wrote in message news:feghf1$fkm$1(a)registered.motzarella.org... > Mr. Arnold wrote: > >> >> "Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmainiac.nospam.net> wrote in message >> news:fedhkn$b3n$1(a)registered.motzarella.org... >>> Mr. Arnold wrote: >>> >>> Snipped. >>> >>>> Are you serious? .Net is dead in your face. It's not going anywhere. >>>> More and more companies along with software developers in the >>>> business sectors are using .Net for Windows desktop and Web >>>> solutions, because .Net is a standard, and the .NET Framework has to >>>> be on the machine. And more and more .Net solutions are coming to >>>> the home sector, and there is no doubt that. .Net is even being used >>>> on Linux, and .Net is down to running on watches and cellular phone. >>> >>> I'm curious! What in Linux uses .net ? >>> >> >> Because .Net is a standard used by many languages and platforms is the >> reason >> it can run on Linux. > > My understanding is that it does not run on Linux! > >> http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page >> > > I'm well aware of "Mono" but it isn't ".net" is it ? Who do think put out .Net? No one else did it but MS that Mono is using. http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page >> > >> Where the programmers go, so does the industry. And until programmers >> like me start programming on Linux using something like the likes of >> .Net that makes it easy to program on different platforms, then Linux >> is really not going anywhere. >> >> But on the other hand, MS may just choke off Linux to keep Linux being >> used by the few. >> http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/ > > Thing is ".net" is proprietary! M$ may or may not try to use it to > attack Linux. "Mono" is open source and cannot be controlled at the > whim of M$. The problem with Open Source as well as Linux is that they have no control and is only appreciated by ones like you, the few. But are you that naive to think that MS doesn't reach far and deep? I got Linux too, and I am going to put it to you point blank. The bit^he Linux is not putting one dime in my pockets. And I suspect it's not putting one dime your pockets either. The be^etch MS has been putting $$$$$ in my pockets for years and will continue to do it for years to come. That is put $,$$$ in my pockets. Nothing against you personally, but you use those (!!!!!!) like you're a bright eyed and bushy tailed hobbyist. |