From: David Southwell on
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> > take a look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> > Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
>
> No, that script contains syntax that doesn't work with Python 3:
> > File "../tools/glib-signals-marshal-gen.py", line 49
> >
> > print 'VOID:' + ','.join(rhs)
> >
> > ^
> >
> > SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
> See:
>
>
> http://docs.python.org/release/3.0.1/whatsnew/3.0.html#print-is-a-function
>
> This one change alone is so fundamental that you should assume that almost
> no python-2 code will run under python-3 without changes....
>
> Regards,
In that case should the port not call for 26?

Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is installed
on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call for it as a
dependency rather than failing because python31-3.1.2_1 is present??

David

dns1# pkg_info |grep python
ap22-mod_python-3.3.1_3 Apache module that embeds the Python interpreter
within the
boost-python-libs-1.43.0 Framework for interfacing Python and C++
libopensync-plugin-python-devel-0.36_2 Python plugin for the OpenSync
framework
py25-kdebindings-krosspython-4.4.5 Kross Python scripting library
py26-dnspython-1.8.0 A DNS toolkit for Python
py26-gtksourceview-2.10.1 A python bindings for the version 2 of the
GtkSourceView li
py26-notify-0.1.1_7 A python bindings for libnotify
py26-telepathy-python-0.15.17 Python bindings for the Telepathy framework
py26-xdg-0.19 A python library to access freedesktop.org standards
python25-2.5.5_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
python26-2.6.5_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
python31-3.1.2_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language

Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov on
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
>> 28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
>>> 28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
>>>> take a
>>>> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
>>>> Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> config.status: executing depfiles commands
>>>> config.status: executing libtool commands
>>>> ===> Building for telepathy-haze-0.3.6
>>>> gmake all-recursive
>>>> gmake[1]: Entering directory
>>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
>>>> haze-0.3.6'
>>>> Making all in tools
>>>> gmake[2]: Entering directory
>>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
>>>> haze-0.3.6/tools'
>>>> gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>>>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
>>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
>>>> haze-0.3.6/tools'
>>>> Making all in extensions
>>>> gmake[2]: Entering directory
>>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
>>>> haze-0.3.6/extensions'
>>>> xsltproc --nonet --novalid --xinclude ../tools/identity.xsl \
>>>> all.xml> _gen/all.xml
>>>> /usr/local/bin/python ../tools/glib-signals-marshal-gen.py _gen/all.xml>
>>>> _gen/signals-marshal.list
>>>> File "../tools/glib-signals-marshal-gen.py", line 49
>>>> print 'VOID:' + ','.join(rhs)
>>>> ^
>>>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>
>>> As in gnome-terminal case you can patch it yourself like this:
>>> print('VOID:' + ','.join(rhs))
>>>
>>> instead
>>>
>>> print 'VOID:' + ','.join(rhs)
>>>
>>> but as i stated in my previous message, the wrong way is to use python26
>>> as your primary python version.
>>
>> the right way, i mean, or the wrong way is not to use python26 :)
> Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is installed
> on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call for it as a
> dependency rather than failiung because python31-3.1.2_1 is present??
>
> David
>
> dns1# pkg_info |grep python
> python25-2.5.5_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
> python26-2.6.5_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
> python31-3.1.2_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language

And what your `python -V` tells?

--
Regards,
Ruslan
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Chuck Swiger on
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> In that case should the port not call for 26?
>
> Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is installed
> on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call for it as a
> dependency rather than failing because python31-3.1.2_1 is present??

You'd have to discuss that with <gnome(a)FreeBSD.org>. However, you would certainly save time if you kept /usr/local/bin/python as a link to python2.6 instead of to python-3.x.

Regards,
--
-Chuck

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: David Southwell on
> 28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
> >> 28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> >>> 28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> >>>> take a
> >>>> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> >>>> Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
> >>>>
> >>>> David
> >>>>
> >>>> config.status: executing depfiles commands
> >>>> config.status: executing libtool commands
> >>>> ===> Building for telepathy-haze-0.3.6
> >>>> gmake all-recursive
> >>>> gmake[1]: Entering directory
> >>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
> >>>> haze-0.3.6'
> >>>> Making all in tools
> >>>> gmake[2]: Entering directory
> >>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
> >>>> haze-0.3.6/tools'
> >>>> gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> >>>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> >>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
> >>>> haze-0.3.6/tools'
> >>>> Making all in extensions
> >>>> gmake[2]: Entering directory
> >>>> `/usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-haze/work/telepathy-
> >>>> haze-0.3.6/extensions'
> >>>> xsltproc --nonet --novalid --xinclude ../tools/identity.xsl \
> >>>> all.xml> _gen/all.xml
> >>>> /usr/local/bin/python ../tools/glib-signals-marshal-gen.py
> >>>> _gen/all.xml> _gen/signals-marshal.list
> >>>> File "../tools/glib-signals-marshal-gen.py", line 49
> >>>> print 'VOID:' + ','.join(rhs)
> >>>> ^
> >>>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> >>>
> >>> As in gnome-terminal case you can patch it yourself like this:
> >>> print('VOID:' + ','.join(rhs))
> >>>
> >>> instead
> >>>
> >>> print 'VOID:' + ','.join(rhs)
> >>>
> >>> but as i stated in my previous message, the wrong way is to use
> >>> python26 as your primary python version.
> >>
> >> the right way, i mean, or the wrong way is not to use python26 :)
> >
> > Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is
> > installed on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call
> > for it as a dependency rather than failiung because python31-3.1.2_1 is
> > present??
> >
> > David
> >
> > dns1# pkg_info |grep python
> > python25-2.5.5_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
> > python26-2.6.5_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
> > python31-3.1.2_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language
>
> And what your `python -V` tells?
python 3.1.2

Ok How do we deal with this?
Some apps need 3.1.2 --
So maybe the ports using python should check for the environment and if
necessary force its own environment at build time with an appropriate setenv
call?? Is this not the correct procedure according to the porters handbook?

David





Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: David Southwell on
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > In that case should the port not call for 26?
> >
> > Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is
> > installed on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call
> > for it as a dependency rather than failing because python31-3.1.2_1 is
> > present??
>
> You'd have to discuss that with <gnome(a)FreeBSD.org>. However, you would
> certainly save time if you kept /usr/local/bin/python as a link to
> python2.6 instead of to python-3.x.
>
> Regards,
I believe the porters handbook recomends that ports should set the appropriate
python environment at build time to prevent this problem occuring.

David

Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"