From: nuny on
On Dec 9 2009, 9:29 pm, Bill Lauritzen <bill360...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> WILL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAVE A SOUL?
>
> In his new book, The Invention of God: On the Origins of Religious and
> Scientific Thought, independent scholar Bill Lauritzen traces
> religious thought back to the early human search to understand oxygen
> and geology.

Talk about yourself in the third person much?

>         Lauritzen says that the search to understand oxygen was the beginning
> of the concepts “spirit” and “soul,” and led eventually to the array
> of chemical elements. “The roots of all the major religions trace back
> to this, and it is ignored by most theologians and scholars,” said
> Lauritzen recently. “That which we call ‘oxygen’ today, was known by
> various names in various cultures: In Egypt by “Ba” or “Ka,” in China
> by “Qi,” in Japan by “Reiki,” in India by “Prana,” and in Greece by
> “Psyche.”

No. The thing you try to translate as "oxygen" actually translates
as "breath".

The Greeks called it "pneuma" from which we get "pneumatics.

The Romans called it "spiro" from which we get "inspire" as in
inhale, "respire", and "conspire".

Hebrew has several words for "breath".

None of those languages, or the ones you mention, had a word for
"oxygen". That word, and the concept it embodies, didn't come along
until very recently. I can't imagine how you managed to miss it, but
combustion has replaced vitalism.

> Thus, robots, or future Artificial Intelligence, have just
> as much right to claim a ‘soul’ as any species, although for them the
> ‘mysterious stuff’ animating them might be electricity.”

What about AI software running on fluidic hardware?

Where's George Hammond when we need him?


Mark L. Fergerson