nilfs2: remove BKL uses
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: [PATCH v2 0/5] patches to settle i8042 with Intel MID platforms
Next: [PATCH V8] input: STMPE touch controller support
From: Frederic Weisbecker on 5 Jul 2010 11:00 On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of > > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs. This > > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)lab.ntt.co.jp> > > This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL > into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final > pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a > shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you > go through the effort of removing it again. I could take his patch in the mount pushdown series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Arnd Bergmann on 5 Jul 2010 11:00 On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs. This > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs. > > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)lab.ntt.co.jp> This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you go through the effort of removing it again. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Ryusuke Konishi on 5 Jul 2010 14:00
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:53:29 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of > > > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs. This > > > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)lab.ntt.co.jp> > > > > This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL > > into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final > > pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a > > shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you > > go through the effort of removing it again. > > > I could take his patch in the mount pushdown series. OK, please treat this patch as needed. I've forgotten the additional BKL push down patch and Jan's BKL removal patch on nilfs, but yes, it looks omissible to add BKL and remove it again there. For now, I will drop my patch from my tree. Thanks, Ryusuke Konishi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |