no absolute (Pascalian) vacuum; no massless rocks o'light
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Time sharing space aether geometry
Next: Aether Displacement - The state of the aether is determined by its connections with the matter
From: spudnik on 16 Jun 2010 20:36 > > - Don't show quoted text - thus&so: it seems that Kooblee and Androcles and Arindam beleive: nothing changes, at all, at light speed, even if it is the ultimate speed. (or, they think that photons are rocks o'light with no mass nor momentum .-) of course, there is nothing unusual about the "symmetric twins, " and there was ne'er any paradox; even less than with Russell's illiterate, tenseless ones -- I'm just sayin', all Cretins are liars; me, three! > http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008arXiv0804.2008N > "We introduce a symmetric twin paradox whose solution can not be found > within the currently accepted provinces of the STR. thus&so: doc Atlas, there is no paradox, if you accept that there is no phenomenon, including sub-atomic angular momenta, that"goes" faster than light. see, it was only a "twin paradox" til explained via Einstein et al's extension of Galilean relativity -- a strawman, really. are you going to argue Ole Roemer's dyscovery of the "retardation" of light, way back, when ever? your proposed "balancing" is almost cute, but iff they accelerate at the same average rate, there clocks'll be in synch at the rendezvous; so, you've described a Twins Miming Each Other "experiment," a null perfection, unlike M&M's results & their refinements. just get rid of the useless notion of Minkowski's phase-space, and you won't have to think so God-am hard about it. > Go ahead and start the calculation then for the time where each twin > coast away or towards each other without any acceleration and with non- --Stop BP's Waxman's arbitrageurs' CAP&TRADE Last Bail-out of Wall Street, the City of London and George Soros et al ad vomitorium! http://larouchepub.com --Fermat's next theorem! http://wlym.com |