no cascade of DIV.links A:hover
in [CSS]
|
Prev: CSS Positioning: 2 Column Blog Theme: Assorted: Newbie Questions
Next: CSS menu works in Safari but not in Opera or Firefox - help appreciated
From: masoncXXX on 10 May 2010 04:18 I have a css file. It includes, for example: DIV.links A:hover { BACKGROUND: #fff; COLOR: #030; } Some of my pages need a different set of link colors. I assumed that style in the html file would over-ride the css file. The internal <style type="text/css"> is working for other things. It does not do so for the links. How come? Can it? Am I missing some simple fact of life? MasonC I'm wearing my SWAT outfit, bullet-proof vest and all.
From: Osmo Saarikumpu on 10 May 2010 12:44 dorayme kirjoitti: > Either way, the link should be green on hover. If it is not, it > is because you ate calf cooked in its mother's milk. I don't see why. ISTM, that in the first case it should be red, as both would have the same origin and specifity. This would result in the latter specified taking precedence. -- Best wishes, Osmo
From: dorayme on 10 May 2010 20:51 In article <hs8svc$46d$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, "MG" <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote: > Lookup specificity in the spec. Section 6.4.3 > Then dorayme's answer will make sense. How dare you! <g> -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 10 May 2010 20:51 In article <hs9d6c$85s$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo(a)wippies.com> wrote: > dorayme kirjoitti: > > > Either way, the link should be green on hover. If it is not, it > > is because you ate calf cooked in its mother's milk. > > I don't see why. ISTM, that in the first case it should be red, as both > would have the same origin and specifity. This would result in the > latter specified taking precedence. Tried it have you? -- dorayme
From: Osmo Saarikumpu on 14 May 2010 07:53
dorayme kirjoitti: >> Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo(a)wippies.com> wrote: >> I don't see why. ISTM, that in the first case it should be red, as both >> would have the same origin and specifity. This would result in the >> latter specified taking precedence. > Tried it have you? Your pragmatism, dear dorayme, is almost extraterrestrial :) http://weppipakki.com/temp/mason.htm Best wishes, Osmo |