From: hr(bob) hofmann on 25 Mar 2010 21:38 On Mar 24, 7:52 am, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > The recent nasty exchanges between me and other people in this group have > forced me to do some thinking. (You might try thinking. It can be an > enlightening experience.) > > I've come to two conclusions. The first that most people are boring, humor- > and wit-impaired un-self-aware folk who wouldn't understand a sentence > written in plain English even if it were parsed by Dr Frank Baxter. > > The second is that UseNet groups are not social groups. They provide a > medium for sharing and learning -- and that should be their alpha and omega. > I'm not here to entertain the group -- or to convince others that I'm Oh So > Terribly Clever. > > I have therefore decided, when commenting, that I will stick to the subject > at hand. No personal remarks, nothing sarcastic, ironic, or even just funny. > > I'm doing this because it's the right thing to do, not because I'm > intimidated by lunk-headed idiots. > > If you give me your attention, I will tell you what I am: > I'm a genuine philanthropist - all other kinds are sham. > Each little fault of temper and each social defect > In my erring fellow-creatures, I endeavor to correct. > To all their little weaknesses I open people's eyes, > And little plans to snub the self-sufficient I devise. > I love my fellow creatures -- I do all the good I can -- > Yet ev'rybody says I'm such a disagreeable man! > And I can't think why! > > To compliments inflated I've a withering reply, > And vanity I always do my best to mortify. > A charitable action I can skillfully dissect, > And interested motives I'm delighted to detect. > I know ev'rybody's income and what ev'rybody earns, > And I carefully compare it with the income-tax returns. > But to benefit humanity however much I plan, > Yet ev'rybody says I'm such a disagreeable man! > And I can't think why! > > I'm sure I'm no ascetic; I'm as pleasant as can be. > You'll always find me ready with a crushing repartee. > I've an irritating chuckle, I've a celebrated sneer, > I've an entertaining snigger, I've a fascinating leer. > To ev'rybody's prejudice I know a thing or two -- > I can tell a woman's age in half a minute -- and I do. > But although I try to make myself as pleasant as I can, > Yet ev'rybody says I'm such a disagreeable man! > And I can't think why! > > -- > "We already know the answers -- we just haven't asked the right > questions." -- Edwin Land You should at least give Gilbert and Sullivan credit for that little bit of prose.
From: buzz on 26 Mar 2010 02:37 hr(bob) hofmann(a)att.net wrote: > On Mar 24, 7:52 am, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...(a)comcast.net> > wrote: >> The recent nasty exchanges between me and other people in this group have >> forced me to do some thinking. (You might try thinking. It can be an >> enlightening experience.) >> >> I've come to two conclusions. The first that most people are boring, humor- >> and wit-impaired un-self-aware folk who wouldn't understand a sentence >> written in plain English even if it were parsed by Dr Frank Baxter. >> >> The second is that UseNet groups are not social groups. They provide a >> medium for sharing and learning -- and that should be their alpha and omega. >> I'm not here to entertain the group -- or to convince others that I'm Oh So >> Terribly Clever. >> >> I have therefore decided, when commenting, that I will stick to the subject >> at hand. No personal remarks, nothing sarcastic, ironic, or even just funny. >> >> I'm doing this because it's the right thing to do, not because I'm >> intimidated by lunk-headed idiots. >> >> If you give me your attention, I will tell you what I am: >> I'm a genuine philanthropist - all other kinds are sham. >> Each little fault of temper and each social defect >> In my erring fellow-creatures, I endeavor to correct. >> To all their little weaknesses I open people's eyes, >> And little plans to snub the self-sufficient I devise. >> I love my fellow creatures -- I do all the good I can -- >> Yet ev'rybody says I'm such a disagreeable man! >> And I can't think why! >> >> To compliments inflated I've a withering reply, >> And vanity I always do my best to mortify. >> A charitable action I can skillfully dissect, >> And interested motives I'm delighted to detect. >> I know ev'rybody's income and what ev'rybody earns, >> And I carefully compare it with the income-tax returns. >> But to benefit humanity however much I plan, >> Yet ev'rybody says I'm such a disagreeable man! >> And I can't think why! >> >> I'm sure I'm no ascetic; I'm as pleasant as can be. >> You'll always find me ready with a crushing repartee. >> I've an irritating chuckle, I've a celebrated sneer, >> I've an entertaining snigger, I've a fascinating leer. >> To ev'rybody's prejudice I know a thing or two -- >> I can tell a woman's age in half a minute -- and I do. >> But although I try to make myself as pleasant as I can, >> Yet ev'rybody says I'm such a disagreeable man! >> And I can't think why! >> >> -- >> "We already know the answers -- we just haven't asked the right >> questions." -- Edwin Land > > You should at least give Gilbert and Sullivan credit for that little > bit of prose. Shhhhh! William probably believes he is the actual author.
From: William Sommerwerck on 26 Mar 2010 21:48 >> There's an old saw about "You can be clever, or you can be >> nice, but you can't be both." I'm reaching an age where I would >> rather be seen as nice than as clever. (I know I'm clever; I don't >> need to prove it to anyone.) > If one cannot be both nice and clever, one isn't being all that clever. > There really are clever ways to please someone, or to choose just > the right birthday present, or to provide help when needed. I'm very good at the kinds of clever you're talking about. (I'm especially at picking the right present.) I was talking about the "bad" clever, the clever for the sake of being clever, the cleverness for self-promotion and ego-enhancement.
From: frenchy on 31 Mar 2010 06:50 > You're one of the most pompous people I've ever seen on UseNet. Who are you > to judge my personality, or anyone else's?>> The second sentence only makes sense without the first.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 1 Apr 2010 17:12 klem kedidelhopper wrote: > > On Mar 31, 6:50 am, frenchy <mf101...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > You're one of the most pompous people I've ever seen on UseNet. Who are you > > > to judge my personality, or anyone else's?>> > > > > The second sentence only makes sense without the first. > > If we're talking about helping each other out with electronic > situations and problems then what does it really matter if ones > presentation is not quite what someone else thinks that it should have > been. I personally never thought of Mr. Sommersworth as being pompous. > And I never saw where he ever outwardly insulted anyone. Unfortunately > I can't say the same for others in this thread. I may not agree with > all of it however I found his dissertation on Pal/NTSC very > interesting and most impressive. I never could have written it. William Sommerwerck is a tech writer. -- Lead free solder is Belgium's version of 'Hold my beer and watch this!'
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Marshall amps , stock fault ? c2003 Next: Looking for hidden service menu - panasonic DMR-E50 |