nvidia-driver 64bit version
in [Ports]
|
From: Emanuel Haupt on 4 Dec 2009 09:47 Hi I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of the new beta state nvidia driver [1]. Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be seperate from x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386. Emanuel [1] http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142120 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Alexey Dokuchaev on 4 Dec 2009 10:18 On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > Hi > > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of > the new beta state nvidia driver [1]. Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now. > > Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from > x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver > could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386. This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing to do. From user's perspective, one should be able to "cd category/port" and "make install". The rest (including taking care of architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying infrastructure. Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see. ../danfe _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Rainer Hurling on 4 Dec 2009 10:25 On 04.12.2009 16:18 (UTC+1), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >> Hi >> >> I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of >> the new beta state nvidia driver [1]. > > Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now. > >> Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from >> x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver >> could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386. > > This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing > to do. From user's perspective, one should be able to "cd > category/port" and "make install". The rest (including taking care of > architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying > infrastructure. Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and > my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see. I tried it with patching your Makefile and distinfo. In Makefile I only changed DISTVERSION and DISTNAME and commented out ONLY_FOR_ARCHS. It installs fine and as far as I can see now all is well :-) This is on 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) from today. Rainer Hurling > ./danfe _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Emanuel Haupt on 4 Dec 2009 10:32 > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Hi > > > > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of > > the new beta state nvidia driver [1]. > > Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now. > > > > > Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate > > from x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and > > x11/nvidia-driver could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386. > > This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best > thing to do. From user's perspective, one should be able to "cd > category/port" and "make install". The rest (including taking care of > architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying > infrastructure. Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, > and my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see. Right, you can put shared make functionality in a seperate file and include it by both ports. Personally I'd prefer two seperate ports rather than OPTIONS because the two drivers don't provide the same funcionality (ie missing TRIM support) and have different versions. Emanuel _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Alexey Dokuchaev on 4 Dec 2009 10:35 On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:32:11PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of > > > the new beta state nvidia driver [1]. > > > > Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now. > > > > > > > > Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate > > > from x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and > > > x11/nvidia-driver could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386. > > > > This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best > > thing to do. From user's perspective, one should be able to "cd > > category/port" and "make install". The rest (including taking care of > > architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying > > infrastructure. Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, > > and my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see. > > Right, you can put shared make functionality in a separate file and > include it by both ports. Personally I'd prefer two separate ports > rather than OPTIONS because the two drivers don't provide the same > functionality (ie missing TRIM support) and have different versions. In any case, I'll post a diff here for review before I make any commits WRT amd64 support in nvidia-driver. ../danfe _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Des cadeaux à petit prix : Accroches Sacs. Next: FreeBSD Port: zaptel-1.4.11.2 |