From: Archimedes Plutonium on


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> >
> > Curiously the P-P supercluster looks out of place for it seems to be
> > partly in the
> > 2nd quadrant and partly in the 3rd. But I reckon that this is a result
> > of the Hubble
> > Law Doppler redshift applied to the P-P that is in error of its
> > distance and perhaps
> > the P-P is not one integral supercluster but rather two different
> > superclusters spaced
> > far apart from one another.
>

There is another explanation for the P-P supercluster that looks a bit
abnormal compared to other superclusters. Looks as though the P-P
is two different superclusters. If we look at the 3D magnet and iron
filings
experiment that as we get nearer to the poles of the magnet the lines
of force
start to bend away from the en masse ensemble of whiskers.

So here is a possiblity that the P-P supercluster is actually two
different
superclusters and where one of them is at a 90 degree angle from the
other supercluster. I am not familar with any other abnormal looking
supercluster
that resembles this oddity, perhaps the Sloan and Great Walls have
abundant
such superclusters meeting at 90 degrees.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies