From: zigzagdna on 17 May 2010 23:54 I find that Oracle 11g takes much longer to start than Oracle 19g or 9g. I am on HP UNIX 11i server, Have others observed similar issue. Are they any init.ora parameters to speed up startup. Thanks.
From: Vladimir M. Zakharychev on 18 May 2010 04:55 On May 18, 7:54 am, zigzagdna <zigzag...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I find that Oracle 11g takes much longer to start than Oracle 19g or > 9g. I am on HP UNIX 11i server, Have others observed similar issue. > Are they any init.ora parameters to speed up startup. > > Thanks. Define "much longer." Did you compare startup times in NOMOUNT mode? Do they differ significantly? Regards, Vladimir M. Zakharychev N-Networks, makers of Dynamic PSP(tm) http://www.dynamicpsp.com
From: Sybrand Bakker on 18 May 2010 05:00 On Mon, 17 May 2010 20:54:18 -0700 (PDT), zigzagdna <zigzagdna(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >I find that Oracle 11g takes much longer to start than Oracle 19g or >9g. I am on HP UNIX 11i server, Have others observed similar issue. >Are they any init.ora parameters to speed up startup. > >Thanks. Please explain why you post every question to all newsgroups and forums you can spell, thus trying to offshore as much of your work as possible, and getting paid for not doing your own work. -- Sybrand Bakker Senior Oracle DBA
From: John Hurley on 18 May 2010 05:31 Sybrand: # Please explain why you post every question to all newsgroups and forums you can spell Probably because it appears to get you really riled up? You can always choose to just scroll on by ...
From: Thomas Kellerer on 18 May 2010 05:35 zigzagdna, 18.05.2010 05:54: > I find that Oracle 11g takes much longer to start than Oracle 19g or > 9g. I am on HP UNIX 11i server, Have others observed similar issue. > Are they any init.ora parameters to speed up startup. So what?
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Export datapump has stopped woring Next: ORA-30036 during ALTER TABLE SHRINK |