Prev: The next step to take
Next: help with tables
From: Frank Swarbrick on 25 Jan 2008 18:54
>>> On 1/24/2008 at 6:53 AM, in message
<ou5hp3pv634r7l7ucevb7sllf76lr05391(a)4ax.com>, Robert<no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>
> SQLBEX means you are using Pro*Cobol, which is buggy and poorly
> supported by Oracle.
> Your best solution is to abandon Pro*Cobol , switch to OpenESQL.

Is OpenESQL a Micro Focus product? Does it work with non-Micro Focus COBOL
compilers?

Frank

From: Frank Swarbrick on 28 Jan 2008 18:49
>>> On 1/25/2008 at 6:50 PM, in message
<t74lp3hal5fd63smm4jiukcgre24nfvtdf(a)4ax.com>, Robert<no(a)e.mail> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:54:49 -0700, "Frank Swarbrick"
> <Frank.Swarbrick(a)efirstbank.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>>> On 1/24/2008 at 6:53 AM, in message
>><ou5hp3pv634r7l7ucevb7sllf76lr05391(a)4ax.com>, Robert<no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>>>
>>> SQLBEX means you are using Pro*Cobol, which is buggy and poorly
>>> supported by Oracle.
>>> Your best solution is to abandon Pro*Cobol , switch to OpenESQL.
>>
>>Is OpenESQL a Micro Focus product?
>
> Yes, and well supported by Micro Focus. The Open in its name is a
> misnomer, it's not open
> source.
>
>> Does it work with non-Micro Focus COBOL compilers?
>
> No.

I asked because I wondered if it could be used with, say, OpenCobol. Guess
not. Ah well.

Frank
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: The next step to take
Next: help with tables