From: Lew on
Todd wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Thanks for all of the responses. I have had a chance to speak with
> the originator of the issue and he said a guru at a prior workplace
> told he and his colleagues to be wary of ordinal. My colleague
> believes this statement was made due to the docs indicating that
> ordinal is likely to be of little use to developers and is primarily
> for internal use. He has yet to get a response from the guru for
> confirmation or other sources.
>
> BTW, my colleague cited Roedy's page on enums, not to defend his
> position, but just as a reference.
>
> Thanks for all the good info and if/when I get a source for the
> warning against ordinal, I will post it.

Some of the real dangers of ordinals have been explained in this thread,
including by Roedy in the message to which you responded here.

--
Lew
From: Arne Vajhøj on
On 12-04-2010 15:43, Todd wrote:
> Thanks for all of the responses. I have had a chance to speak with
> the originator of the issue and he said a guru at a prior workplace
> told he and his colleagues to be wary of ordinal. My colleague
> believes this statement was made due to the docs indicating that
> ordinal is likely to be of little use to developers and is primarily
> for internal use. He has yet to get a response from the guru for
> confirmation or other sources.

So you heard from someone that heard from someone that got
the info from an unidentified source.

:-)

BTW, ordinal returning inconsistent values and ordinals
being of little value for programmers are two very different things.

Arne