From: M.A.Fajjal on
Is there any proof that any prime number can be expressed in the form
p = +/- 3^x +/- 2^y

where x and y are positive integers
From: M.A.Fajjal on
> Is there any proof that any prime number can be
> expressed in the form
> p = +/- 3^x +/- 2^y
>
> where x and y are positive integers

I have found a lot of exceptions
From: master1729 on
M.A.Fajjall wrote :

> Is there any proof that any prime number can be
> expressed in the form
> p = +/- 3^x +/- 2^y
>
> where x and y are positive integers

that is incorrect.

large enough p = 3^a + 3^b - 2^c - 2^d - 2^e - 2^f +/- O(14)

tommy1729
From: Pubkeybreaker on
On Apr 20, 5:28 am, "M.A.Fajjal" <h2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Is there any proof that any prime number can be
> > expressed in the form
> >   p = +/- 3^x +/- 2^y
>
> > where x and y are positive integers
>
> where x and y are non-negative integers

From: Pubkeybreaker on
On Apr 20, 8:13 am, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 5:28 am, "M.A.Fajjal" <h2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Is there any proof that any prime number can be
> > > expressed in the form
> > >   p = +/- 3^x +/- 2^y
>
> > > where x and y are positive integers
>
> > where x and y are non-negative integers- Hide quoted text -
>

Opps. My reply was empty.

Count the number of integers of the form +/- 3^x +/- 2^y up to N.
Count the number of primes.

Now let N --> oo.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: x^3+y^3+z^3 = N
Next: Mathematical Convention