From: Tim Bradshaw on 3 May 2010 13:31 On 2010-05-03 14:02:56 +0100, Norbert_Paul said: > Does that always work? > > I searched the HS a lot but couldn'd find any guarantee that > an accessor foo always has an (fdefinition `(setf ,foo)), > neither could I find the contrary. It pretty much has to work for ordinary CLOS classes (by "ordinary" I mean "assuming no one has done too much MOP stuff"): If I can define a method on (SETF FOO) then I can use FDEFINITION on it.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Lispers in the silicon valley? Next: Online survey jobs & data entry jobs |