Prev: [patch 130/164] GFS2: Fix permissions checking for setflags ioctl()
Next: [patch 149/164] x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point for pvclock
From: Greg KH on 1 Jul 2010 17:10 2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> commit 1f5a81e41f8b1a782c68d3843e9ec1bfaadf7d72 upstream. Dan Roseberg has reported a problem with the MOVE_EXT ioctl. If the donor file is an append-only file, we should not allow the operation to proceed, lest we end up overwriting the contents of an append-only file. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso(a)mit.edu> Cc: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de> --- fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c @@ -964,6 +964,9 @@ mext_check_arguments(struct inode *orig_ return -EINVAL; } + if (IS_IMMUTABLE(donor_inode) || IS_APPEND(donor_inode)) + return -EPERM; + /* Ext4 move extent does not support swapfile */ if (IS_SWAPFILE(orig_inode) || IS_SWAPFILE(donor_inode)) { ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: The argument files should " -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |