Prev: [patch 0/3] Fixup rb_root initializations to use RB_ROOT
Next: disk/crypto performance regression 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 (mmap problem?)
From: venkatesh.pallipadi on 23 Feb 2010 20:50
jffs2 uses rb_node = NULL; to zero rb_root.
The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the
linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULLas well.
This patch uses RB_ROOT as the intializer so all of the relevant fields will
be NULL'd.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi(a)intel.com>
---
fs/jffs2/readinode.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/readinode.c b/fs/jffs2/readinode.c
index e22de83..d32ee94 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/readinode.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/readinode.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static void jffs2_free_tmp_dnode_info_list(struct rb_root *list)
else BUG();
}
}
- list->rb_node = NULL;
+ *list = RB_ROOT;
}

static void jffs2_free_full_dirent_list(struct jffs2_full_dirent *fd)
--
1.6.0.6

--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [patch 0/3] Fixup rb_root initializations to use RB_ROOT
Next: disk/crypto performance regression 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 (mmap problem?)