From: Savoy, Pavan on 29 Jul 2010 03:30 Greg, > -----Original Message----- > From: gregkh(a)suse.de [mailto:gregkh(a)suse.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:24 AM > To: Savoy, Pavan; gregkh(a)suse.de > Subject: patch "Staging: ti-st: update ABI and TODO" added to staging-next tree Is it good enough to be moved out of staging? I mean the multi-device thingy would be more or less a nice to have feature than being a bug, isn't it? The ease for me would be once out of staging, I can cleanup the platform device mess too, since our L-O tree needs to be have some patches in the arch/arm/board-XX.c sort of files... > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > Staging: ti-st: update ABI and TODO > > to my staging-next git tree which can be found at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-next-2.6.git > in the staging-next branch. > > The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree > (usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.) > > The patch will also will be merged in the next major kernel release > during the merge window. > > If you have any questions about this process, please let me know. > > > From 9f912212cd005f9a0a514ae982de915ff94bd765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy(a)ti.com> > Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:26:00 -0500 > Subject: Staging: ti-st: update ABI and TODO > > update TODO to reflect the items taken care of, > update ABI to reflect the new debugfs entries exposed. > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy(a)ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)suse.de> > --- > drivers/staging/ti-st/TODO | 10 +++------- > drivers/staging/ti-st/sysfs-uim | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-st/TODO b/drivers/staging/ti-st/TODO > index 3f68ea1..6a105ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ti-st/TODO > +++ b/drivers/staging/ti-st/TODO > @@ -11,16 +11,12 @@ a st_register() would know whether the registration from BT/FM or GPS was intend > 2. Improve upon the way requirement of line discipline is communicated to > user-space, The current user-space application which open/installs ldisc > as and when required can be found at, > - > http://git.omapzoom.org/?p�atform/hardware/ti/omap3.git;a�ob;f�_st/uim/uim.c;ha16c2c2b5085eb54a1bbc7096d779 > d7594eb11;hb�lair > +http://dev.omapzoom.org/pub/scm/jsistla/L23-btfm.git > +branch: UIM > > 3. Re-view/Re-work on the locking. > > -4. Re-structure to make the ldisc driver more generic for chipsets which mux > -multiple connectivity (BT, FM, GPS) upon 1 TTY port. > - > -5. Remove global references by providing a context which can be moved around the driver like the other > ldisc drivers. (ldiscs tend to use tty's disc_data and platform devices use the device's driver data) > - > -6. Step up and maintain this driver to ensure that it continues > +4. Step up and maintain this driver to ensure that it continues > to work. Having the hardware for this is pretty much a > requirement. If this does not happen, the will be removed in > the 2.6.35 kernel release. > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-st/sysfs-uim b/drivers/staging/ti-st/sysfs-uim > index 10311af..626bda5 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ti-st/sysfs-uim > +++ b/drivers/staging/ti-st/sysfs-uim > @@ -14,3 +14,15 @@ Description: > uninstallation would be ppolling on this device and listening > on events which would suggest either to install or un-install > line discipline > + > +What: /sys/kernel/debug/ti-st/version > +Contact: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy(a)ti.com> > +Description: > + WiLink chip's ROM version exposed to user-space for some > + proprietary protocol stacks to make use of. > + > +What: /sys/kernel/debug/ti-st/protocols > +Contact: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy(a)ti.com> > +Description: > + The reason for chip being ON, the list of protocols registered. > + > -- > 1.7.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Alan Cox on 29 Jul 2010 11:10 > > I mean the multi-device thingy would be more or less a nice to have > > feature than being a bug, isn't it? > > I don't think Alan thinks so. Having the infrastructure that makes it trivial to do right is important. Actually doing the final bits to make it happen may not make sense - especially if it can't be tested currently. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: EHLİYETİ OLAN DİKKAT !!! Next: [patch] kexec: return -EFAULT on copy_to_user() failures |