Prev: proc: don't take ->siglock for /proc/pid/oom_adj
Next: [PATCH v6 7/8, needs improvement] hid: add suspend/resume hooks for hid drivers
From: Greg KH on 30 Mar 2010 16:40
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:16:02AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 03:09:35PM -0700, reinette chatre wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:41 -0700, gregkh(a)suse.de wrote:
> >>> This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
> >>>
> >>> Subject: iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message
> >>>
> >>> to the 2.6.32-stable tree.
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Please note that this patch is really just masking a problem introduced
> >> by a 2.6.32 backported patch. The real fix is
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/86722/ which should be included in
> >> 2.6.32.
> >
> > What is the git commit id for that patch? patchwork links don't help me
> > at all.
>
> There isn't one. The main problem only exists in 2.6.32.y
> because the final hunk missed to remove the nfreed++ from
> ouside the if.
>
> Introduced by backport of in 2.6.32.y
>
> commit a120e912eb51e347f36c71b60a1d13af74d30e83
> Author: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Feb 19 15:47:33 2010 -0800
>
> iwlwifi: sanity check before counting number of tfds can be free

So, what exactly should I be doing here for the .32 stable queue?

what a mess,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: proc: don't take ->siglock for /proc/pid/oom_adj
Next: [PATCH v6 7/8, needs improvement] hid: add suspend/resume hooks for hid drivers