From: Rahul on 28 Sep 2009 15:43 ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst(a)mailinator.com> wrote in news:3d17f33d-e6bf- 478d-8f63-9487df2f177e(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com: > Of course using the original image data would be better than using > some jpg with annotation on it and a colormap applied. > Hopefully by "z" you mean intensity rather than a coordinate, unless > your intensity actually corresponds to a height (I'm not really > familiar with stm images). > Yes, the "z" is the "intensity". z was a function of x and y. Hence the (x,y,z) tuples. Wanted maxima in z=f(x,y). Peaks in the z space as a function of x and y. or "What is the height (in z units) of a peak and where (x,y) are these peaks located) I'm sorry if this wasn't clear earlier. The jpeg simply has the z coordinate put on a color map. Bruno: Did my original post confuse you? I'm sorry if it did. -- Rahul
From: Rahul on 28 Sep 2009 15:45 "Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> wrote in news:h9r2vi$qvm$1 @fred.mathworks.com: > No, as I understand he OP has 3D array I(x,y,z) with > > x=1:nx; > y=1:ny; > z=1:nz; > I guess the array is 2D. z=f(x,y) but the data is still tuples of (x,y,z). Sorry about the notation confusion. A(5,5)=40 A(5,4)=30 A(5,6)=30 A(4,5)=30 A(6,5)=30 -- Rahul
From: Bruno Luong on 28 Sep 2009 15:51 Rahul <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message <Xns9C9495C5DB00F6650A1FC0D7811DDBC81(a)188.40.43.213>... > > Bruno: Did my original post confuse you? It did obviously. Bruno
From: Rahul on 28 Sep 2009 16:34 "Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> wrote in news:h9r436$dte$1 @fred.mathworks.com: >> Bruno: Did my original post confuse you? > > It did obviously. > My bad. Obviously, my terminology was imprecise or I used notation not common in the community. -- Rahul
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: finding eigenvalues of a sparce matrix Next: Removing a data cursor programmatically |