Prev: perf/core Improvement for 2.6.36
Next: [PATCH] [staging-next] [3] Staging: wl_cs.c: fixed invalid UTF-8 style issues in wl_cs.c
From: Frederic Weisbecker on 10 Jun 2010 12:40 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:50:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 05:49 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > If we call perf_event_stop() on a software event and then the > > disable() pmu callback on them after that, we'll call twice > > hlist_del_rcu() on the same hlist node and then bring a crash > > by dereferencing LIST_POISON2. > > > > Just use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead to fix this problem. > > > > This preparates for new context exclusions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec(a)gmail.com> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl> > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme(a)redhat.com> > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus(a)samba.org> > > Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian(a)google.com> > > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov(a)gmail.com> > > Cc: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang(a)linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> > > --- > > kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +- > > kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c > > index 5c004f7..2d818bc 100644 > > --- a/kernel/perf_event.c > > +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c > > @@ -4291,7 +4291,7 @@ static int perf_swevent_enable(struct perf_event *event) > > > > static void perf_swevent_disable(struct perf_event *event) > > { > > - hlist_del_rcu(&event->hlist_entry); > > + hlist_del_init_rcu(&event->hlist_entry); > > } > > > > static void perf_swevent_void(struct perf_event *event) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > > index 4799d70..7bc1f26 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int perf_trace_enable(struct perf_event *p_event) > > > > void perf_trace_disable(struct perf_event *p_event) > > { > > - hlist_del_rcu(&p_event->hlist_entry); > > + hlist_del_init_rcu(&p_event->hlist_entry); > > } > > > > void perf_trace_destroy(struct perf_event *p_event) > > > Ok, so then why did you need the first patch? Because we need perf_event_stop/start to act on software events too. The perf_event_enable,stop/start,perf_event_disable avoidance for software is more an optimization that could be thought in another patchset though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |