Prev: fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
Next: [PATCH v2 0/4] RDC321x southbridge and GPIO support
From: Peter Zijlstra on 11 Mar 2010 03:40 On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:26 -0800, eranian(a)google.com wrote: > This patch is an optimization in perf_event_task_sched_in() to avoid scheduling > the events twice in a row. Without it, the perf_disable()/perf_enable() pair > is invoked twice, thereby pinned events counts while scheduling flexible events > and we go throuh hw_perf_enable() twice. By encapsulating, the whole sequence > into perf_disable()/perf_enable() we ensure, hw_perf_enable() is going to be > invoked only once because of the refcount protection. Agreed, this makes perfect sense. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl> > Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian(a)google.com> > -- > perf_event.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > --- a/kernel/perf_event.c > +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c > @@ -1382,6 +1382,8 @@ void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task) > if (cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx) > return; > > + perf_disable(); > + > /* > * We want to keep the following priority order: > * cpu pinned (that don't need to move), task pinned, > @@ -1394,6 +1396,8 @@ void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task) > ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE); > > cpuctx->task_ctx = ctx; > + > + perf_enable(); > } > > #define MAX_INTERRUPTS (~0ULL) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |