From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo on 6 Aug 2010 10:40 Em Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:58:07PM -0700, Joe Perches escreveu: > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:46 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme(a)redhat.com> > > By using BITS_PER_LONG/4 as the width specifier. > [] > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c > > index 1c61a4f..b62a553 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c > [] > > - ret += repsep_snprintf(bf, size, "%#018llx %c ", self->ip, o); > > + ret += repsep_snprintf(bf, size, "%*Lx %c ", > > + BITS_PER_LONG / 4, self->ip, o); > [] > > - ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "%#016llx", self->ip); > > + ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "%*Lx", > > + BITS_PER_LONG / 4, self->ip); > > This drops leading 0's. Is this a problem? This removes clutter from the output, right? - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [RFC PATCH 2/9] amd64_edac: Remove polling mechanism Next: perf: Export cpumap |