pg_migrator
in [PgSql]
|
From: Robert Haas on 26 Apr 2010 21:32 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. Do > we still want to do that? I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. So I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at some point down the road. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian on 26 Apr 2010 21:46 Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. ?Do > > we still want to do that? > > I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for > keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the > 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. So > I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at > some point down the road. You might also remember I was outvoted. It will not be hard to put it in /contrib as that is already a valid build option for pg_migrator. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 26 Apr 2010 21:55 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: >> > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. ?Do >> > we still want to do that? >> >> I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for >> keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the >> 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. So >> I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at >> some point down the road. > > You might also remember I was outvoted. It will not be hard to put it > in /contrib as that is already a valid build option for pg_migrator. [shrug...] If that's the consensus I'll go along with it, but I'm not excited about adding more things to our to-do list at this point, even apparently simple ones. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Tom Lane on 26 Apr 2010 22:14 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: >> There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. �Do >> we still want to do that? > I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for > keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the > 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. I concur; it's about a month too late to propose this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian on 27 Apr 2010 05:31 Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > >> There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. �Do > >> we still want to do that? > > > I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for > > keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the > > 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. > > I concur; it's about a month too late to propose this. I am confused why it is late. We add to /contrib even during beta, and I didn't bring it up earlier because I didn't want to be pushing my own software. Was someone else supposed to suggest it a month ago? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Discarding the resulting rows Next: Wierd quirk of HS/SR, probably not fixable |