pg_proc without oid?
in [PgSql]
|
From: Magnus Hagander on 19 Feb 2007 04:16 I notice that this patch: http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h.diff?r1=1.443&r2=1.444 inserts a bunch of XML related rows in pg_proc without specifying oid. This breaks the fmgrtab generator on msvc. Most likely because I didn't think of that case. But since all other rows in pg_proc.h contain the oid, I just wanted to check if they're actually supposed to be withuot oid, or if that was a mistake? //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
From: Peter Eisentraut on 19 Feb 2007 05:25 Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 10:16 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > This breaks the fmgrtab generator on msvc. Most likely because I didn't > think of that case. But since all other rows in pg_proc.h contain the > oid, I just wanted to check if they're actually supposed to be withuot > oid, or if that was a mistake? It's intentional. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(a)postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From: Magnus Hagander on 19 Feb 2007 06:17 On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:25:02AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 10:16 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > > This breaks the fmgrtab generator on msvc. Most likely because I didn't > > think of that case. But since all other rows in pg_proc.h contain the > > oid, I just wanted to check if they're actually supposed to be withuot > > oid, or if that was a mistake? > > It's intentional. Could you explain why, and what the expected result is? Since I can't find any other examples of people doing it :-) (will fix the vc stuff, of course, but still interested in knowing) //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(a)postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From: Tom Lane on 19 Feb 2007 10:26 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> writes: > Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 10:16 schrieb Magnus Hagander: >> This breaks the fmgrtab generator on msvc. Most likely because I didn't >> think of that case. But since all other rows in pg_proc.h contain the >> oid, I just wanted to check if they're actually supposed to be withuot >> oid, or if that was a mistake? > It's intentional. Kindly change that intention. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
From: Peter Eisentraut on 19 Feb 2007 10:40 Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 16:26 schrieb Tom Lane: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> writes: > > Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 10:16 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > >> This breaks the fmgrtab generator on msvc. Most likely because I didn't > >> think of that case. But since all other rows in pg_proc.h contain the > >> oid, I just wanted to check if they're actually supposed to be withuot > >> oid, or if that was a mistake? > > > > It's intentional. > > Kindly change that intention. What is wrong? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: New feature request: FlashBack Query Next: Implicit casts with generic arrays |