Prev: [HACKERS] bug in build_startup_packet()
Next: explicit (void *) casts
From: Simon Riggs on 30 Apr 2010 15:05
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(a)2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like
> >> its been through Google translate.
>
> > Because it's not a maximum?
>
> Indeed. It would really be more like min_wal_segments, if we wanted to
> name it that way.

Yeh, agreed: min_wal_segments. I realised while having dinner it was the
opposite, so I'm pleased everybody else got there at same time.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: [HACKERS] bug in build_startup_packet()
Next: explicit (void *) casts