Prev: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Next: nvarchar notation accepted?
From: Bruce Momjian on 13 May 2010 20:23
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote:
> > bruce wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> writes:
> >> > > All other binaries had such a designation, and all /contrib binaries
> >> > > were missing them. ?I assume I was doing cleanup. ?You want the icon
> >> > > removed from the backend makefile?
> >> >
> >> > Yes. ?I'm prepared to believe that not having the icons set on the
> >> > contrib executables was an oversight. ?I'm much less prepared to assume
> >> > that not marking the postgres executable was an oversight. ?Again,
> >> > unless you *know* that this change is needed and appropriate, now is
> >> > not the time to be making it, and especially not without discussion.
> >>
> >> OK, done with attached patch, and I added a comment about why it is not
> >> labeled.
> >
> > I did some research on PGFILEDESC and it does what I thought it does ---
> > in embeds the 'ico' file into the executable in
> > /pg/tools/msvc/Project.pm, and the image looks like the attached JPEG.
> > The image is of a blue elephant head.
> >
> > So, currently, every binary uses that icon, except for the postmaster.
> > Is that what we want? ?You could make the argument that a daemon, like
> > the postmaster, shouldn't have one, which I think is Tom's point.
>
> It's pretty normal that daemons don't have icons.

Yes, that is the logic I was looking for and documented that in the
postmaster Makefile.

> One could argue the same for binaries that are normally never executed
> by the user, just internally - but I don't think we have any of those
> (we're talking EXE not DLL).
>
> There is, AFAIK, no rule (hard or of-thumb) for "icons for GUI
> programs only not commandline ones". Commandline tools usually have
> it.
>
> The argument to be made there is that when you go into the bin
> directory you'll get greeted with a long list of identical elephants.
> It would probably be better if we could have a *different* icon for
> tools that the user is likely to execute himself - which is pretty
> much just psql I think.

All /bin stuff already had icons --- I just added icons to /contrib
binaries.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Next: nvarchar notation accepted?