From: Simon Riggs on 6 Apr 2010 08:01 On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 07:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I've been thinking that the reason we weren't going to beta was > because of the SR open items, but I'm starting to think there's not > much left that really needs to be dealt with. The ones from that list > I think we should fix yet are: > > - Walreceiver and dblink are not interruptible on win32. > - The documentation needs to be improved (if there's still more to do) > - Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode? (i'm working on this) > - The replication connections consume superuser_reserved_connections slots. > > The other stuff strikes me as all window dressing. I'm not happy that "other stuff" just gets punted. Things should definitely not be removed from Open Items list when there is still discussion/objection on them. The purpose of discussion on hackers is so that we take note of those items, not just shrug and walk away from them because some weeks have passed since they were mentioned. I shouldn't have to keep a personal list of things I've objected to, so I can refute what other people say. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: recovery.conf.sample Next: [BUGS] BUG #5394: invalid declspec for PG_MODULE_MAGIC |