Prev: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog
Next: pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
From: Simon Riggs on 11 Feb 2010 13:14
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas(a)enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > -1. it isn't necessary for PITR. It's a new requirement for
> > standby_mode='on', unless we add the file size check into the backend. I
> > think we should add the file size check to the backend instead and save
> > admins the headache.
>
> I think the file size check needs to be in the backend purely on safety
> grounds. Whether we make pg_standby useful for this context is a
> different discussion.

Happy with that.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog
Next: pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL