From: "Joshua D. Drake" on
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:27 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:


> I wasn't really following the join removal discussions, but it seems
> much safer and less complex. And it would not have been feasible to have
> both implementations of FSM around and have the user to choose. I have
> been relieved by the lack of bug reports on the new FSM, that was a big
> change that impacted all installations.

I agree that Simon's argument doesn't hold a lot of water in comparison
to the features he is citing. I say leave it on for Beta just so we can
hopefully get some inherit testing but other than that, its off for
release.

Joshua D. Drake


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Simon Riggs on
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> * rename recovery_connections to hot_standby (and the underlying
> variable from XLogRequestRecoveryConnections to something like
> EnableHotStandby);

OK

> * change its default value to 'off'.

OK

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers