Prev: [HACKERS] pgindent bizarreness
Next: [HACKERS] inlining SQL functions
From: Tom Lane on 2 Apr 2010 11:51
Tatsuhito Kasahara <kasahara.tatsuhito(a)oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> pgstattuple (and pgstatindex) does not contain CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS().
> Therefore, we can not stop pgstattuple() by using the signal while a
> large table is processed.

> Here is the patch to solve it.

Seems to be a good idea --- will apply. Thanks!

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [HACKERS] pgindent bizarreness
Next: [HACKERS] inlining SQL functions