From: z.b. on
added sci.math for followups

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:23:51 -0400, Jon wrote:

> Can anyone tell me why this works?
>
> http://jons-math.bravehost.com/eandpi.html
>
> I deduced it qualitatively. How can you prove it?

No one can prove it, it's false. Although your
e * (2041141/1100)^(1/52) expression is close to pi, being
too large by about 1.4*10^-11, it definitely isn't equal.

The reason your expression is fairly close to pi is that
2041141/1100 is the 10th convergent of the continued-fraction
form of (pi/e)^52.

--
z.b.
From: JosephKK on
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:29:41 +0000 (UTC), "z.b."
<z.b.nospam.3(a)drdaqr.com> wrote:

>added sci.math for followups
>
>On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:23:51 -0400, Jon wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell me why this works?
>>
>> http://jons-math.bravehost.com/eandpi.html
>>
>> I deduced it qualitatively. How can you prove it?
>
>No one can prove it, it's false. Although your
>e * (2041141/1100)^(1/52) expression is close to pi, being
>too large by about 1.4*10^-11, it definitely isn't equal.
>
>The reason your expression is fairly close to pi is that
>2041141/1100 is the 10th convergent of the continued-fraction
>form of (pi/e)^52.

Excellent.