point particle vs particle with structure
in [Relativity]
|
From: Jacko on 21 Jul 2010 07:57 > We are talking about infinitely dense energy in a point particle that > we call mass. Other energy does not weigh and is not mass. Of the order towards infinite energy in a very small point singularity warping space. It does not have to have mass, and could be called Dark Matter. Photons may not have mass, but they have EM attraction, and are captured orbitally arround singularities, even though the singularity has no mass. The EM between orbital light of one singularity to another singularity with orbital light makes a mass effect. This is mass. Although mass may appear to warp space, it is warped space under the influence of light that makes mass.
From: Jacko on 21 Jul 2010 08:00 On 21 July, 01:50, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 20, 8:29 am, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 2:36 pm, gulaman <regala...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Some advice > > > > 1. Study more elementary physics > > > No need > > > > to appreciate that the point particle representation is only for > > > convenient solving of physics problems where some factors affecting > > > the "particle" are not considered. > > > That's what I said > > > > 2. Study complex analysis and your math > > > to know that x/0 is a singularity > > > I understand math just fine, thanks. You can get a mathematical > > singularity when x=0 in 1/x (for example), that's not the only way, of > > course. x/0 isn't a singularity as it gives an infinite value for ALL > > x, not just at a particular x value (ie a singularity). > > > Try again > > ------------------ > psychopath > -------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes I'd say he's very apethetic towards his psychology too.
From: Jacko on 21 Jul 2010 08:03 Warp + Photons => Mass Einstein's buggest mistake was confusing fools into thinking Mass => Warp
From: bert on 21 Jul 2010 10:59 On Jul 21, 7:57 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > We are talking about infinitely dense energy in a point particle that > > we call mass. Other energy does not weigh and is not mass. > > Of the order towards infinite energy in a very small point singularity > warping space. It does not have to have mass, and could be called Dark > Matter. Photons may not have mass, but they have EM attraction, and > are captured orbitally arround singularities, even though the > singularity has no mass. The EM between orbital light of one > singularity to another singularity with orbital light makes a mass > effect. This is mass. > > Although mass may appear to warp space, it is warped space under the > influence of light that makes mass. No such thing as point particle. Electron is a cloud. A point relates to a dot. Bohr's model of atoms being like a solar system is "once upon a Time" bull. It took you into a Quantum tunnel with no light. I know the structure of an electron and posted it here and in altastronomy TreBert
From: Jacko on 21 Jul 2010 12:23
On 21 July, 15:59, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Jul 21, 7:57 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We are talking about infinitely dense energy in a point particle that > > > we call mass. Other energy does not weigh and is not mass. > > > Of the order towards infinite energy in a very small point singularity > > warping space. It does not have to have mass, and could be called Dark > > Matter. Photons may not have mass, but they have EM attraction, and > > are captured orbitally arround singularities, even though the > > singularity has no mass. The EM between orbital light of one > > singularity to another singularity with orbital light makes a mass > > effect. This is mass. > > > Although mass may appear to warp space, it is warped space under the > > influence of light that makes mass. > > No such thing as point particle. Electron is a cloud. A point relates > to a dot. Bohr's model of atoms being like a solar system is "once > upon a Time" bull. It took you into a Quantum tunnel with no light. > I know the structure of an electron and posted it here and in > altastronomy TreBert I think you mis understood me. 'Very small point singularity' did not mean a zero D point of maths, but a very tiny of definite volume 'point'. |