Prev: Show us the F. Code!
Next: plagiarism, no follow-ups please
From: Ragu on 1 Apr 2010 15:55
> My main point is that you don't need pointers for any one way of
> accessing the data. You only need pointers if you are accessing it via
> two different routes. That's pretty much one of the most fundamental
> differences between pointers and allocatables. There are some other
> cases, but that's a biggie.

Thanks again. I see your point and agree that I do not need pointers.

Somehow I lost the big picture while trying to sort out the syntax. A
terrible oversight.

I am comfortable with allocatable arrays and derived types. Will
proceed per your suggestion.
From: Richard Maine on 1 Apr 2010 17:12
Ragu <ssragunath(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Somehow I lost the big picture while trying to sort out the syntax.

That is very, very common.

Glad to have been of help.

--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgment.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Show us the F. Code!
Next: plagiarism, no follow-ups please