Prev: Meaning, Presuppositions, Truth-relevance, Goedel's Theorem and the Liar Paradox
Next: JSH: JSH: JSH:
From: cbrown on 13 Aug 2010 00:03 On Aug 11, 7:01 am, Kent Holing <K...(a)statoil.com> wrote: > By drawing a circle on a map, can I always claim that there are at least two diametrically opposite points on the circle with the same height above the sea level? Others have given solutions; I add that this appears to be a special case (for n = 1) of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem (Wikipedia has an article) which states that given a continuous function f from an n-sphere into Euclidean n-space, f maps some pair of antipodal points to the same point. (Two points on an n-sphere are called antipodal if they are in exactly opposite directions from the sphere's center.) Of course, in practice, the function f in your is not strictly speaking continuous: the circle may pass over an area which "leans out" (rock climbers call this an overhang; but you can image the circle passing through an inverted cone of rock). And depending on how detailed we imagine the definition of 'height' might be, a nit-picker might note that such discontinuities are caused by tiny crystals of stone causing similar discontinuities on the sub-millimeter scale. But if we ignore such very local phenomena, then 'height above sea level' can be thought of as being continuous, and then the answer to your question would be 'yes'. Cheers - Chas
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Meaning, Presuppositions, Truth-relevance, Goedel's Theorem and the Liar Paradox Next: JSH: JSH: JSH: |