Prev: New! Eliminate middlemen - authors make more money!
Next: Broken pkgdep on jdk-1.6.0.3p4_15 ?
From: Russell Jackson on 19 May 2010 14:59
I've got an port patch that includes adding entirely new ports along
with it. Should these new ports be submitted in separate PRs or along
with the maintainer update for the one existing port?

--
Russell A. Jackson <raj(a)csub.edu>
Network Analyst
California State University, Bakersfield

From: Wesley Shields on 19 May 2010 15:07
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:59:50AM -0700, Russell Jackson wrote:
> I've got an port patch that includes adding entirely new ports along
> with it. Should these new ports be submitted in separate PRs or along
> with the maintainer update for the one existing port?

It's a matter of preference I think. I usually prefer that the new ports
each be submitted in their own PR and the update mention that it
requires the new ports to be added. This can be done just by referencing
the PR number for the new ports in the update. This way any audit trail
information is contained to just the port it applies to.

-- WXS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: New! Eliminate middlemen - authors make more money!
Next: Broken pkgdep on jdk-1.6.0.3p4_15 ?