From: Andres Perera on 8 Aug 2010 00:18 On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Doug Barton <dougb(a)freebsd.org> wrote: > On 08/06/2010 16:01, Andres Perera wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Doug Barton <dougb(a)freebsd.org> wrote: >>> On 08/06/2010 15:03, Adam Vande More wrote: >>> >>>> While your in the mood for for taking portmaster suggestions, >>> >>> I am always in the mood for taking suggestions. :) >>> >> >> On that note, I suggest that portmaster should fallback on PKG_PATH, >> which is explained in pkg_add(1), if LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR isn't defined. > > It uses PACKAGES if LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR is not defined, which is a > throwback to the days before package installation support because it > uses that location for other things too. > The problem is that PM_PACKAGES_LOCAL requires LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR regardless. That inconsistency aside, PACKAGES definately makes more sense now. Andres _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
|
Pages: 1 Prev: japanese/ibus-mozc build error Next: portmaster and environ from pkg_install tools |