From: Doug Barton on 28 Sep 2009 21:40 Ok, Shota, your opinion? Doug Pierre Guinoiseau wrote: > Personally, I prefer Baptiste's version, it's more complete. :) > > Mel Flynn wrote: >> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 21:03:48 Doug Barton wrote: >>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Here is a more complete ZSH completion for portmaster, can people test >>>> it and validate it please. >>>> >>>> to make it work, copy it to /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions >>>> reload you zsh >>>> >>>> and portmaster [tab] >>>> >>>> http://github.com/bapt/zfbsd/blob/master/_portmaster >>> Since I don't use zsh I have no way to judge what is "better" here, so >>> I will leave it to the community to point me in the right direction. >> I like this one, but haven't tested the "former". Will do tomorrow as I >> suspect daily csup will give me the new portmaster with the old zsh >> completion. >> >> @Baptiste, feature request for csup :>. Currently csup -L2 /etc/[tab] gives: >> No matches for: `verbosity level' or `corrections' >> >> Sorry for the little hijack, feel free to take it off list. > -- This .signature sanitized for your protection _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: GCC cross build fails for ARCH=arc and ABI=elf32 Next: gretl package installation failure |