From: wen heping on 16 Mar 2010 20:30 Based on David's message, I modify the Makefile, the diff is as below, Would you have a test of it ? And I found in tmux website that tmux require ncurse while the ports did not depends, is it possible that lacking of ncurse depends caused the run error ? Regards, wen --- Makefile.orig 2010-03-17 08:14:19.000000000 +0800 +++ Makefile 2010-03-17 08:24:37.000000000 +0800 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= tmux PORTVERSION= 1.2 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/${PORTNAME}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION} @@ -24,9 +25,14 @@ PORTDOCS= CHANGES FAQ NOTES PORTEXAMPLES= * +.include <bsd.port.pre.mk> post-patch: - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '/^#define HAVE_TREE_H/d' \ +.if ${OSVERSION} <= 800000 + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '/^#undef HAVE_BROKEN_KQUEUE/d' \ ${WRKSRC}/configure +.endif + + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '/^#define HAVE_TREE_H/d' ${WRKSRC}/configure do-install: @${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/tmux ${PREFIX}/bin @@ -45,4 +51,4 @@ @${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/examples/* ${EXAMPLESDIR} .endif -.include <bsd.port.mk> +.include <bsd.port.post.mk> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Barak Michener on 16 Mar 2010 20:57 I tried your patch -- it didn't work. However, David's message helps: Looking inside the configure script for tmux in the source package, there's a line for Darwin-based systems: #define HAVE_BROKEN_KQUEUE copying that line to the FreeBSD section and compiling makes tmux-1.2 work great :) This is my first email to the ports list, so I don't have much Makefile-foo. The patch you gave me didn't work, but I think you're on the right track... _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Gary Jennejohn on 17 Mar 2010 08:06 On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:05:08 +0200 Andriy Gapon <avg(a)icyb.net.ua> wrote: > on 17/03/2010 04:46 wen heping said the following: > > Hi, > > > > Would you test this patch ? > > If it works, I shall commit it. > > > > I think that it would be interesting/useful to understand in what respect FreeBSD > kqueue is considered 'broken' by tmux code. > Actually it's the kqueue handling in devel/libevent, which is used by tmux, which considers our kequeue(2) implementation to be broken. The code in kqueue.c:kq_init() from libevent calls kevent() [kqueue(2)] with nchanges=1 and nevents=64. It assumes that kevent() will always return 1 on success. According to kqueue(2) kevent will return up to nevents on success. I'm not sure whether our kevent() should return 1 because nchanges=1 or not. So the question is whether kq_init() is making a bad assumption or not. In any case it seems that devel/libevent should be fixed, if necessary, rather than applying a bandaid to tmux. --- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
|
Pages: 1 Prev: FreeBSD Port: virtualbox-ose-3.1.4 Next: FreeBSD Port: apr-ipv6-gdbm-db42-1.3.9.1.3.9_1 |