Prev: Any way to archive the same using regexp transport in versions2.3+
Next: TLS not being advertised or not running?
From: Victor Duchovni on 22 Jul 2010 18:15 On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote: > > The local(8) and virtual(8) servers are separately compiled > > programs (the latter being a stripped down version of the former). > > The header files in question are not used in the same compilation > > unit, and so this suggestion is not productive. > > > > > Ah, even more fun. Using a different typedef with the same name all over > the source tree. > I would never recommend someone to have a global symbol redefined in the > same source tree. Even if it are different applications as in this case. > > Anyway, my remarks is still valid if you change file local.h instead of > virtual.h. I will refrain from responding in detail, there is nothing substantive here, the real issue is discussed in the other comments in this thread. Over and out. -- Viktor.
From: Kai Krakow on 22 Jul 2010 18:24
2010/7/22 Wietse Venema <wietse(a)porcupine.org>: > The pass-by-value structure is part of a Postfix safety mechanism, > and therefore I am not inclined to change it to work around buggy > compiler features. Wise decision... Stick with that. :-) -- Regards, Kai Krakow http://hurikhan77.wordpress.com/ |