From: Robert Haas on
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
> too.  A search of our code finds

It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
Too bad.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Software_Design

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Tom Lane on
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
>> too. �A search of our code finds

> It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
> nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.

Um ... so do you remember which symbol they predefined? It's pretty
lame that we can't even spell it consistently in one source file.
(Or, if BSDI is so dead that no one remembers, shouldn't we rip out
those #if branches?)

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Robert Haas on
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
>>> too.  A search of our code finds
>
>> It's a commercial distribution of BSD.  I remember it being pretty
>> nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
>
> Um ... so do you remember which symbol they predefined?  It's pretty
> lame that we can't even spell it consistently in one source file.
> (Or, if BSDI is so dead that no one remembers, shouldn't we rip out
> those #if branches?)

No clue. I agree. (Yes.)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Peter Eisentraut on
On lör, 2010-05-15 at 00:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
> of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
> something authoritative about which and what.

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Peter Eisentraut on
On lör, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
> nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.

BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS, which was Bruce's main
development environment at some point, which is why it has left
excruciating traces all over the PostgreSQL source.


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers