Prev: predicting neutrino rest mass; 6(pi^5) == 5f6 == 1836 ; (pi^7)/22 == 137 ; pi == subshells/shells ; (e) == occupied subshells/shells #571 Correcting Math
Next: predicting neutrino rest mass; 6(pi^5) == 5f6 == 1836 ; (pi^7)/22 == 137 ; pi == subshells/shells ; (e) == occupied subshells/shells #573 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 7 Apr 2010 00:37


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I probably made a mistake by saying these four are the elementary
> particles:
> electron, proton, neutron, neutrino. The neutron is just a combination
> of electron,
> proton and neutrino. So the only three elementary particles, other
> than the photon,
> are the electron, proton and neutrino.
>
> So can I predict the neutrino rest mass from the Plutonium Atom
> Totality structure?
>
> The Plutonium Atom Totality structure predicts the inverse fine-
> structure constant
> and the number pi and the number (e) and the proton to electron rest
> mass ratio.
>
> As the title tells: 6(pi^5) == 5f6 == 1836 ; (pi^7)/22 == 137 ; pi ==
> subshells/shells ; (e) == occupied subshells/shells.
>
> The Plutonium atom has 22 subshells in 7 shells of which only 19
> subshells occupied
> at any instant of time, thus giving the numeric value of what (pi) and
> (e) will be. The Plutonium
> atom has a 5f6 subshell and this subshell gives the electron to proton
> rest mass as
> 6(pi^5) == 1836. The structure of the plutonium atom of its energy
> levels gives the inverse
> fine structure constant as that of (pi^7) / 22 == 137.
>
> Because the structure of the Plutonium Atom gives the fine-structure
> constant and the
> proton/electron mass ratio, and the values of (pi) and (e). Then the
> structure of the
> plutonium atom should give what the rest mass of the antineutrino or
> neutrino.
>
> The rest mass of the neutrino should be the symmetry breaking of the
> photon.
>
> The rest mass of the muon is 105.7 MeV and the electron is 0.511 MeV
>
> The mean life of the muon is 2.1 x 10^-6 seconds
>
> The rest mass of the neutron is 939.6 MeV and a mean life of 918
> seconds.
>
> This **suggests** that the amount of time versus rest mass of the
> neutron is that of a ratio of 939/918 or approx 1 MeV/sec.
>
> For the muon this rest mass to time ratio is 105.7/2.1 is approx 50 eV/
> sec.
>
> As for the Plutonium Atom structure, I am dealing with a number that
> is
> in the millions as a ratio of neutrino rest mass versus the electron
> rest
> mass. And with a number in the 10^6 we are looking at a (pi^12). Does
> the plutonium atom totality have a pi^12 energy structure? Well if you
> count the Poincare Dodecahedral Space, you may recall there are 12
> faces.
>
> Now I have to go and look up to see what the current best estimate or
> experimental
> results of what the neutrino rest mass is? Whether it is close to 50
> eV.

Alright, I did not want to look up the current state of affairs of
research of
neutrino rest masses until after I executed the above post.

I see that 50 eV is the upper limit of neutrino rest mass as given by
Wikipedia:
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
The strongest upper limit on the masses of neutrinos comes from
cosmology: the Big Bang model predicts that there is a fixed ratio
between the number of neutrinos and the number of photons in the
cosmic microwave background. If the total energy of all three types of
neutrinos exceeded an average of 50 electronvolts per neutrino, there
would be so much mass in the universe that it would collapse. This
limit can be circumvented by assuming that the neutrino is unstable;
however, there are limits within the Standard Model that make this
difficult. A much more stringent constraint comes from a careful
analysis of cosmological data, such as the cosmic microwave background
radiation, galaxy surveys, and the Lyman-alpha forest. These indicate
that the sum of the neutrino masses must be less than 0.3 electronvolt.
[16]

--- end quoting Wikipedia ---

So now, let me make a slight and minor adjustment in my calculations
of neutrino rest mass.
Let me say, theoretically, that the only difference between a electron
and a muon, is that the
muon has traded away space and time for more rest mass. For those that
have followed
my posts through the years, know that I believe the Strong Nuclear
Force is where a electron
trades away its space and time to be a "nuclear electron" a tougher
binding electron than a
normal electron and this is where the Strong Nuclear Force is created
out of Electromagnetic
force. And the muon is what I consider an "escaped nuclear electron"
so that we can glimpse
what a electron that is the Strong Nuclear Force. Sort of like seeing
glimpses of a snow leopard running through the forest trees.

The above calculations were done on the muon, but let me do it on the
electron itself using
the mean life of the muon at 2.1 x 10^-6 seconds.

The rest mass of the muon is 105.7 MeV and the electron is 0.511 MeV

The mean life of the muon is 2.1 x 10^-6 seconds.

We assume the muon is merely an electron that has traded away its
space and time
and in receipt obtained more rest mass.

The rest mass of the neutron is 939.6 MeV and a mean life of 918
seconds.

This **suggests** that the amount of time versus rest mass of the
neutron is that of a ratio of 939/918 or approx 1 MeV/sec.

For the electron this rest mass to time ratio is 0.511/2.1 is approx
0.24 eV/sec.

So now, let me go back to that Wikipedia website to see what the
experimental
physicists have reported as to the rest mass of the neutrino and
whether it
is about 0.24 eV


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: predicting neutrino rest mass; 6(pi^5) == 5f6 == 1836 ; (pi^7)/22 == 137 ; pi == subshells/shells ; (e) == occupied subshells/shells #571 Correcting Math
Next: predicting neutrino rest mass; 6(pi^5) == 5f6 == 1836 ; (pi^7)/22 == 137 ; pi == subshells/shells ; (e) == occupied subshells/shells #573 Correcting Math