Prev: help with trig manipulation? (cot formula, Brocard points)
Next: Nike shoes the best here
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 12 Apr 2010 14:15
Looks like I am the first physicist to notice that Physics has only
one Natural fundamental
speed, the speed of light, and that all other speeds are "local and
situational."

Except for when Tifft found redshift quantization.

Now the Plutonium Atom Totality explains pi, and "e", and the fine-
structure constant,
and the proton to electron mass ratio as these:

22 subshells in 7 shells

19 occupied subshells in 7 shells

22 / (22/7)^7

6 (22/7)^5 which is the 5f6 energy level

So the Plutonium Atom Totality at the start gives the most important
numbers in both
physics and in mathematics, all four connected and interrelated. This
is how any and
every science works, and must work, where the questions are all
answered by connected
interrelated simple answers.

The trouble with speed in Physics is that there is only one apparent
Natural and fundamental
speed, that of light. So there is no second speed that is fundamental
to place in a ratio
such as the proton to electron mass ratio.

However, at the end of the 20th century rose a keen research study by
Tifft measuring redshift which is basically galaxy speeds. He found a
quantization, focused around
72 km/sec.

Now I have been looking to see a list of the quantization speeds, and
so far have not
found a complete list. Perhaps Halton Arp who is doing an excellent
job in teaching this
subject of speed quantization has a complete list. If he does, I would
appreciate him
posting it of such a complete list of quantizations.

So far I have found these numbers:

220 km/sec

72 km/ sec with increments of 2.4 x 10^-4

increments of 1.24 x 10^-4

144 km/sec

Earlier in this book, I predicted the neutrino rest-mass by using the
idea
that the only true fundamental particles are photon, proton, electron,
and neutrino
and that all the other particles in Nature are just basic addons of
these four particles.
That only the stable particles in Nature are fundamental and that
anything with a
mean decay life is a addon or secondary particle. The particles in
physics are
quantized. So the speeds in physics should be quantized also.

So what would the increment of speed be? I propose that the Fine
Structure Constant
is the increment.

Notice that in the Tifft research, the increments are showing up to be
about

1.24 x 10^-4

And the fine structure constant of 1/137 = 0.0072

The electron to proton mass ratio is 1/1840 = 0.00054

Now the speed of light is 299,792 km/sec and if it was a increment of
the Fine Structure Constant then the next lowest available speed would
be 297,633 km/sec.

Now does that make sense for the speed of the neutrino?

Maybe and maybe not. It was recently reported that a faraway supernova
was recorded of its neutrino influx relative to its photon influx. The
report,
if my memory serves me correctly, reported that the neutrinos came at
the
same time as the photons. Seems to me that if the neutrino speed was
297,633 km/sec, it would have lagged behind significantly to have
noticed.

But I think that there were those slower neutrinos, however, the
faster neutrinos
in flavor switching were the ones recorded in that supernova watch. I
believe
that neutrinos want to be "light" rather than be material rest mass
objects,
and the reason we have all these flavor neutrinos, is that their
internal mechanisms
"want to be light" rather than "want to be material matter."

I also remember reading in that supernova watch was a delay time of
incoming radiation.
So that perhaps the "delayed or slow neutrinos" were mistaken for what
was a
normal delay in how the supernova evolves in its explosion. Supernova
are not that common
so we may have to wait before we get another one of these
opportunities to measure
the speed of neutrinos.

And what I would like to have is all the recorded Tifft speeds to see
if the Fine Structure
Constant is behind all those numbers.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: help with trig manipulation? (cot formula, Brocard points)
Next: Nike shoes the best here