From: Steve Amphlett on 30 Jul 2010 10:29 "Giovanni Ughi" <giovanni.ughi(a)yahoo.it> wrote in message <i2umlh$n2k$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > suggested solution seems to work well. > > But, if I change the windows clock (system time) will this "crack" the time-bomb? > > there is any solution robust to that? > > thanks in advance Winding the clock back is surprisingly harmful these days. Not to be recommended, specially if it's running other licensed software.
From: us on 30 Jul 2010 10:44 "Giovanni Ughi" <giovanni.ughi(a)yahoo.it> wrote in message <i2umlh$n2k$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > suggested solution seems to work well. > > But, if I change the windows clock (system time) will this "crack" the time-bomb? > > there is any solution robust to that? > > thanks in advance the solution is not working... 1) no need to play with the clock... 2) the user can simply overload the function NOW... us
From: Walter Roberson on 30 Jul 2010 10:45 Giovanni Ughi wrote: > suggested solution seems to work well. > > But, if I change the windows clock (system time) will this "crack" the > time-bomb? > > there is any solution robust to that? Network connection to a server that indicates whether it is authorized or not. To prevent the user from interposing a different server, use encryption on the transaction. Do not make the return value a simple binary "yes/no" as the user could simply alter that return value.
From: Andy on 30 Jul 2010 10:58 "us " <us(a)neurol.unizh.ch> wrote in message <i2uofk$l42$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > "Giovanni Ughi" <giovanni.ughi(a)yahoo.it> wrote in message <i2umlh$n2k$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > > suggested solution seems to work well. > > > > But, if I change the windows clock (system time) will this "crack" the time-bomb? > > > > there is any solution robust to that? > > > > thanks in advance > > the solution is not working... > 1) no need to play with the clock... > 2) the user can simply overload the function NOW... > > us Quick fix: use builtin('clock') to get the current date and time as a datevec, and compare that to your time bomb date.
From: us on 30 Jul 2010 11:14
"Andy " <myfakeemailaddress(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <i2up9s$elv$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > "us " <us(a)neurol.unizh.ch> wrote in message <i2uofk$l42$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > > "Giovanni Ughi" <giovanni.ughi(a)yahoo.it> wrote in message <i2umlh$n2k$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > > > suggested solution seems to work well. > > > > > > But, if I change the windows clock (system time) will this "crack" the time-bomb? > > > > > > there is any solution robust to that? > > > > > > thanks in advance > > > > the solution is not working... > > 1) no need to play with the clock... > > 2) the user can simply overload the function NOW... > > > > us > > Quick fix: use builtin('clock') to get the current date and time as a datevec, and compare that to your time bomb date. well... then the user overloads BUILTIN... us |