Prev: circumstantial evidence for Wegener but not for Darwin; what about Atom Totality? Chapt 2 #161; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Dissolved oxygen of Gulf Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 14 Jun 2010 16:29
Now I put several question marks in the title. I seem to remember that
Dirac in his
book Directions in Physics said that additive creation would mean the
Moon is moving
towards Earth at 2cm/year and if multiplicative creation was true the
Moon would
be moving away at 2cm/year.

I seem to have come to favor additive creation because if we look and
examine the
whole of the Solar System, the bodies seem to be moving closer
together to
one another for Neptune has gone off track as per Titius Bode Rule and
is moving
to join with Uranus.

And if we examine exoplanets, they are revolving very near or close to
their
parent stars.

I had a look in Wikipedia for the local group of galaxies:
--- quoting Wikipedia ---

Future collision of the Milky Way with Andromeda
Main article: Andromeda–Milky Way collision

The Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Sun at about 100 to 140
kilometres per second (62 to 87 mi/s),[59] so it is one of the few
blue shifted galaxies. The Andromeda Galaxy and the Milky Way are thus
expected to collide in perhaps 4.5 billion years, although the details
are uncertain since Andromeda's tangential velocity with respect to
the Milky Way is only known to within about a factor of two.[60] A
likely outcome of the collision is that the galaxies will merge to
form a giant elliptical galaxy.[61] Such events are frequent among the
galaxies in galaxy groups. The fate of the Earth and the Solar System
in the event of a collision are currently unknown. If the galaxies do
not merge, there is a small chance that the Solar System could be
ejected from the Milky Way or join Andromeda.[62]
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---

Notice that Andromeda is on a collision course with the Milky Way.
(Although I would not
hold any verity in the doppler blue shift claim.)

Now maybe, just maybe, it was rather impossible for any science
experiment to measure
the Dirac NEW RADIOACTIVITIES for the Moon or any experiment here on
Earth. Maybe
the technical accuracy is far demanding of precision.

But perhaps the mass of an entire galaxy of the local group can make
Dirac's new
radioactivities a easier measurement. If additive creation is the true
Dirac new
radioactivities, and if the Solar System is just not big enough to
measure this
additive creation due to the interference of so many other things
going on such as
the incoming cosmic dust and debris to the Moon to mess up the 2cm/
year measure.

Perhaps we need whole galaxies to make the measurement of Dirac new
radioactivities.
So what would Dirac have calculated for Andromeda moving towards Earth
to have
been, if it were additive creation? Would it have been something like
2 light years/year??

Come to think of it, would not the fact that galaxies cluster together
is caused by
this Additive Creation process of Dirac new radioactivities? Or at
least a factor along
with say magnetohydrodyamics that causes clustering of galaxies.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: circumstantial evidence for Wegener but not for Darwin; what about Atom Totality? Chapt 2 #161; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Dissolved oxygen of Gulf Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico