q-hat^-1 ?
in [Relativity]
|
From: George Hammond on 2 Mar 2010 18:32 On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:11:05 -0800 (PST), Igor <thoovler(a)excite.com> wrote: >On Mar 1, 3:43�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:22:41 -0800, eric gisse >> >> <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >Ken S. Tucker wrote: >> >[...] >> >> >> I think you're right George, it's sinking in to "Geese" that >> >> he'll never be able to play in our scientific sandbox [...] >> >> >You have never published anything in your life. You have no accomplishments >> >of note. >> >> [Hammond] >> Here's my CV Geeseball........ lets see yours? >> >> � � � � � CURRICULUM VITAE >> � � � � � � �GEORGE HAMMOND >> >> B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute >> � � � � � � �Worcester MA, USA >> M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, >> � � � � � � �Boston MA, USA >> Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 >> � � � � � � �Northeastern Univ. Boston MA >> Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt >> � � � � �at N.U. �and who is presently Distinguished >> � � � � �Professor of Physics at TAMU >> >> Peer reviewed publications: >> >> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in >> � New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 >> � Pergamon Press. �Online copy of peer/published >> � � �paper is posted at:http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html >> >> Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God >> � Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic >> Press) >> � � �Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html >> >> ======================================== >> GEORGE �HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE >> � � � � � � � � � � � Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond >> � � � � � � � � � � � Mirror site >> � � �http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com >> � � �HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto >> � � �http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 >> ======================================= > >Peer-review in psychology? Is that getting approval from the inmate >in charge at the asylum? > > [Hammond] You have a solid reputation as a clever mathematical physicist Igor. Don't sully it by flaunting your homespun cultural erudition in front of the world intelligentsia. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez on 3 Mar 2010 15:31 eric gisse wrote on Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:23:32 -0800: > Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > [...] > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect :-D
From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez on 3 Mar 2010 15:34 eric gisse wrote on Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:27:38 -0800: > Ken S. Tucker wrote: > >> On Feb 28, 7:24 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: >>> On Feb 28, 3:44 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Feb 27, 6:08 am, "Jay R. Yablon" <jyab...(a)nycap.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>> > > My query here is in reference to the position operator q-hat, >>> > > which commutes with the momentum operator p-hat along any single >>> > > space dimension according to the canonical commutation >>> > > relationship: >>> >>> > > [q-hat,p-hat]=i h-bar (1) >>> >>> > > Query: Is there a known *inverse* position operator q-hat^-1? If >>> > > so, what is it and can you point out a reference(s) in which it is >>> > > derived and discussed. >>> >>> > Jay, when are you going to post an easy problem? Ok, I'll give it a >>> > shot... >>> > Allow me to simplify the rotation to, >>> >>> > m*[V(y)*x - V(x)*y] = h >>> >>> > where V(y) is the mass m Velocity in direction y. >>> >>> > Allow me to unitized (for ascii sake) m and q to follow, then, sub a >>> > positional potential O(x) = (q/r^2) * x for the inverted q-hat, >>> > (I'll use "O" because positional potentials are measured w.r.t an >>> > Origin), >>> > but that - with q (charge) unitized is dimensionally 1/L , >>> >>> > O(x) = x/r^2 . >>> >>> > Putting that together yields, >>> >>> > V(y) O(x) - V(x) O(y) = h/r^2, (h=action). >>> >>> > Interpretation's can be found from r=ct. Let me know if we should go >>> > there. >>> > Regards >>> > Ken S. Tucker >>> >>> Good job, Ken. The OP asked about A=B and you naturally showed >>> something related to Q=V. >> >> Igor, if there was something immediate Jay the genious would have got >> it. >> What I demo'd was an inversion of the Length dimension, in an algebraic >> way, from an antisymmetrical spin, to arrive at the q-hat^-1 spec. >> >> Two ways to intrepretation are as follows, >> >> 1) E=hf = h/t = h/ct = m, h/r^2 == m/r (gravitational potential). >> >> 2) E/t = Power >> >> A quick glance at this UFT article explains the fusion, of (1) and (2), >> >> http://physics.trak4.com/MST_UFT.pdf >> >> wherein potential and power are related by, dg_00 = - dW_00. >> >> Power is something that's not dicussed much, it's like a hidden alien >> lurking in physics. >> Regards >> Ken S. Tucker > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning?Kruger_effect You cannot give a correct URL Eric, not even one about you :-D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: The Implications of the 5th force in Relativity Next: Speed of gravity |