Prev: Disabling Subscript Formatting & Locking Subplot Axis Dimensions
Next: Does fread function remember the position of each reading?
From: Mark Schenk on 3 Feb 2010 14:10 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:39:03 -0000, Mark Schenk <markschenk(a)operamail.com> wrote: A brief update on my own post: after looking at the problem a bit longer it seems to be a fluke that eigs in Matlab 2009a gives correct results for the lowest eigenvalues of near-singular matrices. The (existing) methods for finding low eigenvalues of sparse matrices simply can't seem to deal with singularities. It still leaves a few questions though: > (1) should Matlab provide an error when 'eigs' is used on near-singular > matrices, warning that the results might be wrong? There is currently no > explicit mention of this in the 'help eigs' and you need to actually > know how the algorithm works to know that you can't solve singular > matrices. I know it's hard to establish how singular a matrix is, but at least warnings might be given that the results might be inaccurate due to the matrix' near-singularity. > (2) were there changes in how 'eigs' is handled in recent versions of > Matlab? I tried comparing the two versions of 'eigs.m' but have only > found superficial code refactorisation so far, and as far as I can tell > no major functional changes. If it is an updated version, is it now > reliable enough to use 'eigs' on near-singular matrices? I'm still intrigued what the differences between eigs in Matlab 2007a and 2009a is, and why I can't find any documentation on the changes. -- Mark Schenk |